Besides the name, what's wrong with the iPad?
The recently unveiled iPad was hyped as the device that will revolutionize the gadget industry—but is it worth all the fuss? Check out NPR’s quick (under five minute) podcast where host Liane Hansen talks to Laura Sydell about where Apple might have gone wrong with the iPad (besides the name).
(Via NPR)
*

Comments (14)
They should have looked at the Microsoft Courier tableton Gizmodo, now THAT is cool (I can't believe I said that about a potential MS product)!
2) Apple controls the software distribution system cradle to grave. This is a deal killer for me. But more importantly they open the barriers to entry for competitors. This will give Google a window and they will capitalize on it.
3) No battery swap out by users
Apple continues to out innovate the entire PC, phone and digital media player spaces, lapping the field several times over. But the insistence on closed OS's and now closed application marketplaces will be Apple's undoing imo.
Apple has proven itself able to out-innovate competitors. The first iPod was big and clunky. Now, a few years later, an iPod Nano shoots video, is a fraction of the size of the original iPod, and weighs next to nothing. Give the iPad 5 years of innovation and I bet it will be an amazing device. This is just round one...
(The name is still silly though)
I think it has yet to find/be marketed to its eventual audience, which will be the masses. The iPad could eventually be that ubiquitous device that we all assume the iPhone is because of media saturation regardless of actual market penetration. Imagine if everyone aged 35 and up and 15 down who have not embraced online content consumption because of either technophobia or parental controls, could take the iPad for a spin; there is a chance perceptions would change.
Here's a different light on the negatives:
Lack of features = An uncomplicated, dedicated device with a clear purpose
No Flash = More 3G for everyone
"Big ITouch" appearance = Building on a design that already has a presence and has been embraced
Bottom Line: a big, beautiful, easy-to-use internet machine for grandparents, grandkids, and technophobes in general.
Good for a hipster kid with a big trust fund who can shell out $1.99 to watch a music video off iTunes a couple of times.
same thing happen when the FIRST iPod was introduced, all bunch of people complaining, all it does is plays mp3, can only buy music from Apple etc...LMAO
Look at where is Apple with that right now...Look at what back then the top of the line iPod did and what the Nano can do right now...It even shoots videos! This is only the beginning...chill out!
Most of the other issues I have seen people griping about are software related. Things like multitasking and flash support (HTML5 anyone?) will be overcome in iPhone OS 4.0. I understand why Apple didn't shoot all its guns at once there.
The only other physical things that is missing, which is also absent from MacBooks, is a SIM card slot. It would be cool to snap pics or shoot video and be able to access it on the iPad without resorting to cables.
Leave a comment...