Google explains the meaning of "open"
Google explained its definition of “open.” Here are some key paragraphs from the post by Jonathan Rosenberg, senior vice president, product management. Note: Jonathan addressed this memto to Google employees, so references to “you” refers to Google employees.
- “Today, we base our developer products on open standards because interoperability is a critical element of user choice. What does this mean for Google Product Managers and Engineers? Simple: whenever possible, use existing open standards. If you are venturing into an area where open standards don’t exist, create them. If existing standards aren’t as good as they should be, work to improve them and make those improvements as simple and well documented as you can. Our top priorities should always be users and the industry at large and not just the good of Google, and you should work with standards committees to make our changes part of the accepted specification.”
- “So as you are building your product or adding new features, stop and ask yourself: Would open sourcing this code promote the open Internet? Would it spur greater user, advertiser, and partner choice? Would it lead to greater competition and innovation? If so, then you should make it open source. And when you do, do it right; don’t just push it over the wall into the public realm and forget about it.”
- “So while having more personal information online can be quite beneficial to everyone, its uses should be guided by principles that are responsible, scalable, and flexible enough to grow and change with our industry. And unlike open technology, where our objective is to grow the Internet ecosystem, our approach to open information is to build trust with the individuals who engage within that ecosystem (users, partners, and customers). Trust is the most important currency online, so to build it we adhere to three principles of open information: value, transparency, and control.”
- “Open will win. It will win on the Internet and will then cascade across many walks of life: The future of government is transparency. The future of commerce is information symmetry. The future of culture is freedom. The future of science and medicine is collaboration. The future of entertainment is participation. Each of these futures depends on an open Internet.”
Read the entire blog post to get all the information Jonathan provided about Google’s definition of “open.”
Comments (7)
This is probably the reason why their search engine isn't open sourced or published, even if doing so would spur competition and improve the open internet as a whole.
Yet at the same time I have to agree to some extent with Tsahi, Google is very good at spreading the "don't be evil" mantra but they are still a business which will always choose profit over loss.
I can't wait to see how far they are willing to take this.
Leave a comment...