Holy Kaw! All the topics that interest us

Trust in "friends" takes a dive

Media_httpdldropboxco_emokc

Holy kaw, just when you had this whole word-of-mouth, social-networking, transparent, follower, friend, mayor thing all figured out, Advertising Age and Edelman drops this bomb: the number of people who consider their friends and peers credible sources dropped from 45% to 25% since 2008.

Richard Edelman opines, “The events of the last eighteen months have scarred people. People have to see messages in different places and from different people. That means experts as well as peers or company employees. It’s a more-skeptical time. So if companies are looking at peer-to-peer marketing as another arrow in the quiver, that’s good, but they need to understand it’s not a single-source solution. It’s a piece of the solution.”

The credibility of TV dropped twenty-three points and radio news and newspapers dropped twenty points too.

My explanation is that “friend” has a very different meaning these days. It used to mean someone you’ve known for years in a face-to-face manner. Now many friends represent the click of your mouse. I have about five “real” friends, and I trust them more than ever.

Full story at Advertising Age.

More on social media.

Photo credit: Fotolia


Comments (5)

Feb 08, 2010
KevinCole509 said...
Actually I suspect it has a lot to do with the cheapening of the concepts of friendship and knowability that the web and social media have helped broaden out to mean, "have vaguely heard of and not gotten pissed off at yet." I look at what it took for me to consider someone a friend some years ago versus the way my teen-age kids throw the term around and gotta wonder if it's one more word whose meaning has been lost beyond recall - like so many others these days. (I hate sounding like my dad did, but geez!)
Feb 09, 2010
cathmary said...
I agree.. the concept of friendship is now highly diluted compared to what it was, say, 30 years ago. I have hundreds of "friends" on FB (due to formerly playing Mafia Wars). My in-real-life friends on FB numbers only around 60, and, of those, most are acquaintances (former classmates and colleagues).

If I don't have a person's cell phone (and/or home phone), their personal email, their snail mail address, and haven't seen them face-to-face in a year or so (if they live locally), they are not "friends". They are merely acquaintances.

Feb 09, 2010
Joe Buhler said...
That's exactly what I tweeted when I first read this. It all depends on the definition of friend.
Feb 09, 2010
meachmaker said...
Suggest prudent use of the phrase "trusted friend" Sort of sums it up. U can have 100's of friends but far fewer TFs.
Feb 10, 2010
alwaysart said...
Agreed with the comments above. I have a handful of true friends in life, my online friends are friendly acquaintances. It comes back to that old question:
Who will pick you up at the airport at 2 AM if you don`t have a ride?

Leave a comment...