Holy Kaw! All the topics that interest us

Twitter: Hurt or help to language?

The moral is that the brevity of an e-mail message, a blog post, a text message, even a tweet, is no obstacle to powerful information, a persuasive argument, a literary moment, a zinger, a joke. These forms need not be word dumps, any more than the short forms that preceded them by decades and centuries.

via poynter.org

Over on Poynter.org, Roy Peter Clark, producer of the hit podcast “Writing Tools” on iTunes U, ruminates on his entrance to Twitter. An old school writer and wordsmith, Clark discusses whether the popular microblogging phenomenon is deteriorating our language skills or in fact helping them blossom. His inquiry is thoughtful, and I especially appreciated his comparison to old telegraph forms (“Samuel F. B. Morse, founder of the telegraph, sending his first formal message, 1844: WHAT HATH GOD WROUGHT.”)

Read Clark’s article to see his verdict on whether Twitter is a help or hurt to language. Certainly, Clark re-inspires the sanctity of language—140 characters or beyond.

Writing or tweeting? We’ve got a wealth of tips on both.


Comments (4)

Nov 27, 2009
Alistair Owens said...
I recall amazing abbreviations used in telex messages to keep them short (you paid for each letter used) which had no effect on our educational standards in the written word. Just as it's amazing what can be said in 140 twitter characters when you put your mind to it.
Nov 27, 2009
baxton6 said...
My first weeks of experience with twitter are very positive, but the real message of twitter are hyperlinks - the few words are just a bit of marketing to attract attention. Twitter is the equivalent of brain synapses.
Dec 26, 2009
nima said...
hi .by
Dec 26, 2009
nima said...
hi .by

Leave a comment...

 
Got an account with one of these? Login here, or just enter your comment below.
Posterous-login    twitter