Holy Kaw! All the topics that interest us

Why crocs crashed

It’s true that you can have too much of a good thing—especially in the case of branding. The last thing you want is to burn too bright, too fast, only to fizzle out in a few months. Take crocs, for example. If they had made better branding strategy decisions, they’d still be a shoe wear staple, rather than a soon to be forgotten fad. It’s important to remember some key guidelines for keeping your brand hot, rather than not.

First, you want to recognize the need to dampen demand. Don’t flood the market with your product. If customers see too much of it, it will quickly (and surely) lose its appeal.

Second, resist line extension. Crocs didn’t stick to their original design—they immediately started producing flip-flops, winter crocs, even high heels! Crocs made the mistake of trying to appeal to everyone, when they should have focussed on what they’re good at—functionality and comfort.

Learn more about creating a brand to withstand the test of time here.

Brand with the best of ‘em.


Comments (13)

Nov 07, 2009
FL_StevieD said...
If you are going to say why we crashed, be good enough to say why we are still here and on our way back.
Nov 07, 2009
Zahzel Rose said...
Yes they are green shoes and their high heels are soooooo comfortable. There stocks are inching up.
Nov 07, 2009
james peckham said...
Crocs crashed? Seem like every nurse in the world wears those. I wish you were right about crocs because i hate those damned ugly things. Maybe the branding info you posted is worthwhile, but I will never know.
Nov 08, 2009
Shradha said...
very true, but i guess there is both sides to it.. in perception driven societies you need to shout non stop to be heard cause all the big guys are anyways at it,after all the age old adage out of sight out of mind.
Nov 08, 2009
robin sharma said...
The organization that tries to be everything to everyone ends up being nothing to anyone
Nov 08, 2009
John Marr said...
The original Crocs had one problem a lot of brands don't need to worry about. They looked different from anything else you'd put on your feet and that look was a key factor in their rocket rise. Great for instant brand recognition but also, a wide open door for low cost imitators. I think that Crocs did a pretty good job of riding the initial fad. They seem to have stuck with the retailers that launched them and let the mass-marketers - Walmart etc. - sell the knock-offs. Loyalty has long legs and when the fad runs its course and the lowballers move on to the next look you'll still be able to buy original Crocs at Crocs retailers.
On the subject of brand extension - Its easy to sit in the stands and decry the team for not sticking to the playbook. But down on the field (or out on the ice eh?) things aren't always smooth and predictable. Converse tried for years to extend their brand beyond the iconic Chuck Taylor All Star. In the end, failed and were swallowed up by Nike. Timberland launched their signature boating shoe and, without skipping a beat followed with a complete footwear (and eventually clothing) line. They're still around and seem to be doing pretty well.
Nov 08, 2009
Pam M. said...
This is a bit over-simplified. Everyone I know who wears them wears them for comfort. That's not a fad. The clogs didn't fit me right, so I didn't like them. But I wear the sandals everyday. I wouldn't call giving options "flooding" the market.
Nov 08, 2009
Ray george said...
We use crocs for quick outside utility purposes. That need won't go away. I don't care if they're ugly when I'm taking out the trash.
Nov 08, 2009
Hassan Mikail said...
luv my crocs, not as comfortable as i would have expected them to be, but still have them lying around in my Aquino wannabe bathroom shoe rack...Crocs entire USP (forget the colors & various designs) was all Sole based (that part where the bottom of your foot hits the plastic...that's what we call it..right?), and that's what they've built their entire product line extension on...and its a good one...same mold, texture, etc...problem: using them on a daily basis was not comfortable (the clogs), that's all..the fit was never snug and my foot kept floating...to get the perfect Croc clogs fit was difficult, needed that snug feel, to keep your hooves in check;) I believe they'll improve and quell the 'Crocs was just a fad' stereotype...
Nov 08, 2009
Scott Bratcher said...
I'd like to see Catherine chime in again after this comment thread's points have been considered.
Nov 08, 2009
perduecreative said...
Oh No! Crocs are out?? I just bought my second pair, their new Santa Cruz canvas slip-ons and love them so much I can't take them off. Perhaps the news of their death is greatly exaggerated?
Nov 08, 2009
Al Garcia said...
Crocs are ugly and I think they should have never existed. I get the fact they are comfortable and stuff, but you can't throw away style and you personal decent dressing code for those things, halfaway between flip-flops and something else. I hate to see them, I hate seeing people wearing them with socks or without socks, I hate the colors. I'm totally sure there are plenty of options out there which combine comfort and style and don't make you look like and idiot. You have to think forward, beyond to the future: when you look back at pictures from the 80s with people wearing ridiculous clothes and realize it's stupid in the present (or actually 5 years after wearing that) you realize that crocs are just a temporary fashion thing and not a real trend.
Nov 08, 2009
Tina said...
If you want to talk about a brand that is flooding the market to the point of causing its own extinction, look no further than Ed Hardy. Cigarette lighters? AIR FRESHENERS? Really? In 6 months, no one will even remember who they were.

Leave a comment...

 
Got an account with one of these? Login here, or just enter your comment below.
Posterous-login    twitter